Getting started with solving real life problems - an introduction
Welcome to Real Life Problem Solving. Hope you have gone through our previous post.
We made only one
recommendation last time: "be aware about your own problem solving process."
As you would agree, real
life problems can be of innumerable types. Can there be any single formula or
method of solving any kind of real life problem? Obviously there can’t be. Just
as no mathematical problem can be solved using a single formula or method, for
different types of mathematical problems you need to apply different methods; similarly
you need to adopt an appropriate and suitable approach for solving a real life
problem.
But there is a big
difference between a mathematical problem and a real life problem. A mathematical
problem, if it is solvable (there are unsolvable mathematical problems),
however hard it is, someone somewhere can solve it using known techniques and
methods. In other words, mathematical problems:
a. Are Well defined and well structured with no
uncertainty
b. Have clearly known methods for reaching the
solution(s), and
c. Even the solutions are precise and exact.
Though there are mathematical
problems not yet declared to be unsolvable, those are perhaps of interest only
to mathematicians.
In contrast, real life
problems:
a.
Are generally ill defined and ill structured
b.
Have no prescribed method of reaching the solution
c.
Involves lots of uncertainty, and
d.
Have no precise or exact solution. We can say -
solution of a real life problem is a solution only when it is acceptable to the
people affected and involved in the problem.
Real life Problem Solving as a separate discipline
Real life Problem Solving as a separate discipline
Till this point of time we have
solved all kinds of problems in our personal and work lives, but we have solved
them according to our problem solving abilities, without any formal teaching on
the process and methods of problem solving. Did you ever think how you solved a
particular problem? Did anyone systematically explain how a particular problem
has been solved? Were you ever taught how to solve real world problems better?
Here we will deal with Problem
Solving as a separate discipline and will mostly concentrate on the process of
problem solving rather than the solutions we have reached.
Though we
are only interested in solving real world problems, we will take recourse to
solving a number of mathematical problems not so much as to learn mathematics
but rather to learn the principles and techniques involved in solving the
problems. The same principles and techniques used in solving well-prepared
mathematical problems can be used effectively in solving real world problems
also.
What is the
central mental activity in solving a problem? Basically it is Decision Making.
For each action we have to take a decision.
Can you cite some examples of decision making?
So while we discuss Problem Solving, we would
automatically discuss decision making required to solve the problems. Decision Making will be an interwoven
subject of discussion.
Innovation
All problem
solving requires innovative capabilities, but the experts usually have
qualities to see beyond the obvious, generate totally novel possibilities and
arrive at very high value solutions. By using these qualities people innovate.
And in today’s world, especially in the cutting edge competitive world, innovation is considered to be the most valuable
human resource. Countries measure their trend of national innovative
capability content and take steps to improve on this front. For organizations
in a competitive environment, Innovation becomes the key capability that
differentiates the players. Only routine efficient work won’t finally succeed. You need to innovate.
So at some point of time with due regard we will
go into Innovation as a separate topic. In spite of this daunting nature of real life problem solving, it is possible
a. To approach any such problem not in a random manner,
but in a systematic, scientific and effective manner
b. To select suitable powerful and abstract principles,
techniques, tools, methods and strategies, and
c.· Arrive at low-cost solutions that are acceptable to
the people affected.
In fact all the renowned
Business Consultants use their own business problem solving resources to advise
their clients effectively. Some are very effective some are not so effective.
There is no guarantee even in a business problem solving scene that the
Consultant will produce a fully satisfactory solution to the client.
In real life, all physicians,
lawyers, property consultants, tax consultants and so on are actually real life
problem solvers, but working in their specific work areas.
Who can advise you in your
general kind of problem? Suppose, you have had a serious difference with your
boyfriend. Who can advise you how to go ahead and take decisions that will
prove to be good for you? Or take the case of the dilemma of deciding where to
go for a 5 day trip during your holidays with highly satisfying experience of
all concerned. You will consult with concerned people and choose a trip plan in
your own way. Can this trip planning process be improved?
We recognize two objectives at this point of time:
1.
To improve quality of solution for any real life
problem, and
2.
To improve learner’s own real life problem solving
ability.
Decision problem
When there is more than one choice, a decision is to
be taken
Two important persons in a decision
problem world are the Decision Analyst or DA and the Decision Maker or the DM. The
DA is responsible for expert analysis of the problem and advising the DM. Only
DM can actually take the decisions, either as advised by the DA or according to
his own judgments. Many times both roles are combined into one person.
A decision is to be made when there
is more than one choice. By evaluating the available feasible choices,
according to a set of relevant criteria, a proper decision is to be made
which will hopefully fulfill some stated objective, that is, in other
words, will solve an identified problem.
So a decision problem consists of
problem
definition that includes goals or objectives of solution,
criteria of
evaluation of choices, and
the set of
choices available.
It also consists of the
set of actors or the entities comprising of affected parties, stakeholders,
decision makers (we will call them DM), the drivers of problem solution process
and the Decision Analysts (we will call them DA) (Who are all the stakeholders in a business?)
equipments and processes,
resource constrains, and
the domain principles, truths, and concept relationships.
In other words, in a problem scenario, we have specifically three important active agents:
a. Problem owner: One or
more than one person affected by the problem, interested in solving the problem
and having minimum resources to solve the problem. In many cases real life
problems do exist but it becomes difficult to find a clearly identifiable
problem owner. All big problems of this world are of such types.
b. Decision maker or DM: One or
more than one person authorized and capable of making decisions in implementing
the solution to a problem. Many times but not always the DM and the problem
owner are the same entity.
c. Decision Analyst or the DA: One or more than one person whom we can call the Problem Solver. It is
the responsibility of the DA to analyze the problem and come up with
recommendations to the DM for reaching the solution.
Usually, all three roles
are combined into YOU, unless you are able to find a capable DA or become a DA
yourself.
Before the sixties we did not have any reliable and relatively scientific method for carrying out this kind of evaluation. The difficulty arises because of the qualitative nature of the criteria that need to be evaluated for each of the possible alternatives.
From nineteen sixties onwards a few powerful methods were introduced for dealing with such problems. These qualitative multiple criteria based (MCDM) problems have been aptly classified under the group of MCDM problem solving methods.
This class of problems are so prevalent that we will again show due regards to this special branch of problems and treat the topic of MCDM problems in a separate thread or blog.
Multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT) was the first such significant method followed by the most popular method of Analytic Hierarchic Process or AHP.
Read my other blogs
on Innovative idea generation and its basic principles and Get smart, get innovative usingTRIZMulti-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) problems
In a large class of real life problems we need to evaluate more than one choices or alternatives for fulfilling a desired goal. Examples are: choice of a house, buying a car, recruiting a new employe and so on. In all these cases, the alternatives are evaluated on the basis of a set of important criteria or characteristics that are important for making the final choice.Before the sixties we did not have any reliable and relatively scientific method for carrying out this kind of evaluation. The difficulty arises because of the qualitative nature of the criteria that need to be evaluated for each of the possible alternatives.
From nineteen sixties onwards a few powerful methods were introduced for dealing with such problems. These qualitative multiple criteria based (MCDM) problems have been aptly classified under the group of MCDM problem solving methods.
This class of problems are so prevalent that we will again show due regards to this special branch of problems and treat the topic of MCDM problems in a separate thread or blog.
Multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT) was the first such significant method followed by the most popular method of Analytic Hierarchic Process or AHP.
Problem life-cycle stages
Stage 1: Problem awareness or Problem
identification:
The awareness that a problem that needs solution has been created at this
stage.
Stage 2: The decision that the problem needs to be
solved taken: In
many situations, even though it is known by all concerned that a serious
problem exists, the overpowering sure confirmed decision to solve the problem
is not taken.
Stage 3: Requisite ownerships in the problem domain have
been established: In complex problem solving situations, responsibility
or ownership of the problem, of the feasible solution and actions thereof are
necessary prerequisites for proper problem definition, solution decision
recommendations and the implementation of the recommendations. Ownership is
needed at various levels.
Stage 4: Objectives analysis, Problem
definition, Classification and specification: At this stage, detailed analysis is carried
out by the DA by study of domain information, structured discussions with
domain owners (DO in short), the DMs and domain experts (DE in short) to form
the Primary Objective Set for the problem solution. This set may be a single
member set or multi-member or multi-objective set. Most complex problems we
will deal are single objective multi-criteria decision making type. Examples of single objective MCDM problems
are,
To find a suitable location for a new factory
To rate or evaluate an organization against a
benchmark of performance
To resolve a conflicting situation and so on.
But more complex multi-objective
real-life problems do exist that are amenable to scientific decision solution
approach. The term MODM is a frequently encountered terminology for such
problems. Examples are,
Creating a balanced budget that satisfies multiple
objectives
Forming a National Telecom Policy that is expected to
satisfy multiple goals
Creating an integrated marketing and production plan
for a product portfolio of an organization so that within a stipulated time,
profits are maximized up to a minimum expected level, market penetration is
achieved up to a minimum expected level and also Customer goodwill is increased
to a minimum expected level.
Apart from MCDM
problems there are other problem types. At this stage of problem life-cycle,
the nature of the problem is first understood clearly.
Stage 5: Formation of the problem solving
model: At this stage, the
problem solving model is created from the problem specification. A good model
includes plan of problem solving as well.
Stage 6: Problem solving decision
recommendations and actions:
At this stage, the DA applies suitable scientific and pragmatic methods
on the Problem solving model and solution recommendations are submitted to the
Decision Maker or DM for taking appropriate decisions and actions. If it is a
Dynamic Decision Making class of problem, repeated recommendations and actions
will take place.
Stage 7: Status Review and solution effectiveness measurement: At every stage of decision making and action,
there needs to be a good mechanism to review the status in terms of measurable
effectiveness to see whether the desired goal is reached at that stage.
Stage 8: Recommendation and
implementation of Problem Prevention and Problem identification mechanisms: A good DA will include in his recommendations
a set of recommendations for prevention of recurrence of the problem as also
detection of the problem if it recurs in future. If it so happens, then the
life-cycle starts again from Stage 1, but with increased knowledge and
experience, of course if such knowledge is captured by the problem owner
organization in usable form.
Before we end this session we would like to leave two short problems and one question-linked innovative anecdote for you to dwell upon.
Short problem 1:
Short problem 1:
What can you hold in your right hand, but not in your left?
What is your reasoning?
Short problem 2:
How can you throw a ball as hard as you can, and make it stop and
return to you, without hitting anything and with nothing attached to it?
What are crucial parts of
the problem description that are responsible in making the solution more
difficult?
Anecdote 1:
After a difficult waiting period of three months (as I was traveling) I could finally undergo my cataract operation successfully. I had got my new specs and with a new vision was enjoying in a friends' meet.
My friend on my left asked me, “I saw you two months ago but I
couldn’t perceive that you had cataract. After the cataract operation, how do
you feel?” I was not prepared for the question and answered
noncommittally. To compensate, my other
friend on my right answered the first friend, “You could have understood if you
had looked from the back of his eyes, not from the front.”
What are the principles
used here?
To become a problem solver, you must solve problems and also recognize how you had solved the problem. Continuous building upon this problem solving experience will take you a long way towards becoming a problem solver
To become a problem solver, you must solve problems and also recognize how you had solved the problem. Continuous building upon this problem solving experience will take you a long way towards becoming a problem solver
No comments:
Post a Comment